4.6 Article

Modified Zerilli-Armstrong and Khan-Huang-Liang constitutive models to predict hot deformation behavior in a powder metallurgy Ti-22Al-25Nb alloy

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111749

Keywords

Ti-22Al-25Nb alloy; Constitutive model; Zerilli-Armstrong model; Khan-Huang-Liang model; Spark plasma sintering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isothermal uniaxial compression tests were conducted to establish constitutive models for a fine-grained Ti-22Al-25Nb alloy fabricated by spark plasma sintering under high vacuum. The modified Zerilli-Armstrong model and the Khan-Huang-Liang model were developed in different phase fields, with improved versions yielding higher prediction accuracy. The improved models are appropriate for predicting the hot deformation behavior of the alloy.
In order to establish constitutive models for a fine-grained Ti-22Al-25Nb alloy fabricated by spark plasma sintering under high vacuum, isothermal uniaxial compression tests are conducted at the different deformation conditions of 950-1070 degrees C and 0.001(-1) s(-1). Using the friction-corrected experimental data, the modified Zerilli-Armstrong model and the Khan-Huang-Liang model are developed in the alpha(2) + beta/B2 + O triple-phase and alpha(2) + B2 two-phase fields, respectively. The determination coefficient (R-2) and average absolute relative error (AARE) of the developed models are 0.9773 and 8.73%, 0.9831 and 12.36%, respectively. Based on the analyzing the reason of large deviation, the modified Zerilli-Armstrong and Khan-Huang-Liang models are improved. The prediction accuracy of the improved constitutive models is improved to 0.9896 and 6.14%, 0.9891 and 6.82%, respectively. This indicates that the improved versions of the modified ZA and KHL models are very appropriate for predicting the hot deformation behavior of a fine-grained Ti-22Al-25Nb alloy fabricated by spark plasma sintering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available