4.6 Article

Characterization of BN interface and its effect on the mechanical behavior of SiCf/SiC composites

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.111918

Keywords

Boron nitride; Characterization; SiCf; SiC composites; Mechanical property

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The boron nitride (BN) interface of SiC fiber-reinforced SiC matrix (SiCf/SiC) composites was fabricated using chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) with BCl3 and NH3 as precursor. The microstructure and chemical composition of the BN interface were studied. The influence of coating thickness on the tensile behavior of SiCf/SiC composites was evaluated. The BN interface synthesized at 800 degrees C displayed a low degree of crystallization and a quasi-isotropic microstructure. The optimal thickness of the BN interface was found to be about 670 nm.
The boron nitride (BN) interface of SiC fiber-reinforced SiC matrix (SiCf/SiC) composites was fabricated by chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) using BCl3 and NH3 as precursor. The microstructure and chemical composition of the BN interface were characterized. The influence of the coating thickness on the tensile behavior of SiCf/SiC composites was then evaluated. The BN interface synthesized at 800 degrees C has a low degree of crystallization and displays a quasi-isotropic microstructure. The ratio of element B to element N is near 1 and the oxygen content is about 10%. Meanwhile, the electron structure of B, N atoms near the SiC fiber surface have more sp2 hybridi-zation state. Increasing the BN interface thickness exerts a critical role in decreasing the interfacial sliding stress which improves the tensile strength and toughness of SiCf/SiC composites. The optimal thickness of the BN interface is about 670 nm and further increasing the thickness exhibits little improvement on the mechanical properties of SiCf/SiC composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available