4.6 Article

Microstructural evolution of TiC nano powders under fast neutron irradiation: A multi-technique analysis

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112338

Keywords

Nano crystal titanium carbide; Neutron irradiation; Raman; FTIR; TEM; SAED

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, titanium carbide nano powders were irradiated with different fluencies of fast neutrons. The microstructure of the irradiated powders was analyzed using various methods, such as X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and FTIR spectroscopic analysis. The results showed that there was no significant phase transition or amorphization in the irradiated TiC nano powders. However, the water molecules absorbed on the material surface were disintegrated under the influence of fast neutrons. Morphological analysis also confirmed the exceptional structural stability of titanium carbide to neutron irradiation.
In this work, titanium carbide nano powders were irradiated at normal conditions of 293.15 K and 1 atm with fluencies of 4.0 x 1012 n/cm2, 8.0 x 1012 n/cm2, 1.3 x 1013 n/cm2, 4.0 x 1014 n/cm2, and 1015 n/cm2 (neutron energy 1 MeV). The microstructure of the titanium carbide nano powders after irradiation was examined using Xray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and FTIR spectroscopic analysis methods. The X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that no significant phase transition or amorphization occurred in the TiC nano powders exposed to fast neutrons. More sensitive results obtained from the FTIR analysis showed that the water molecules absorbed on the material surface were disintegrated under the influence of fast neutrons. Exceptional structural stability to neutron irradiation of titanium carbide without amorphization was also observed by morphological analysis via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and selected area electron diffraction (SEAD).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available