4.1 Article

MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Initial Experience of Monitoring Tumor Response by Dynamic Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements at 3.0 T

Journal

UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000529873

Keywords

Prostate cancer; MR-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation; Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; Dynamic apparent diffusion coefficient monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective analysis evaluated changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in biopsy-proven prostate cancer after TULSA-PRO treatment at 1, 3, and 6-12 months. The results showed a significant increase in ADC values after 6-12 months, suggesting that ADC can serve as a biomarker to monitor the follow-up after TULSA-PRO.
Introduction: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as part of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an important sequence for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). The objective of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in biopsy-proven PCa undergoing TULSA-PRO (MR-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of the prostate) at 3.0 T after 1, 3, and 6-12 months posttreatment. Methods: Nineteen patients underwent follow-up examinations after 1, 3, and 6-12 months including mpMRI at 3.0 T and urological-clinical examinations with quantitative analysis of ADCs. Results: In PCa, a significant increase of ADC values after 6-12 months was measured after TULSA-PRO treatment by 29.1% (pre-TULSA: 0.79 +/- 0.16 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, 6-12 months: 1.02 +/- 0.35 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s), while the corresponding value in the reference tissue decreased by 48.5% (pre-TULSA: 1.20 +/- 0.15 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, 6-12 months: 0.91 +/- 0.29 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). The mean ADC values in the early follow-up groups at 1 and 3 months did not change significantly. Conclusion: DWI with ADC as part of mpMRI can serve as a biomarker to dynamically monitor the follow-up after TULSA after 6-12 months. For early posttreatment progression, it is not suitable due to too many confounding variables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available