4.4 Article

Designing an Electric Transit Route Network Utilizing Energy Storage Technology to Mitigate Annual Demand Charge

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
Volume 2677, Issue 8, Pages 158-174

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/03611981231155904

Keywords

public transportation; bus transit systems; optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrification of traditional transit route networks is a promising option for urban public transit. By utilizing energy storage (ES) chargers, the proposed bi-level optimization model aims to minimize travel times and costs while considering demand charges for electric transit networks. The discrete multi-objective grey wolf optimizer algorithm is suggested to search for feasible solutions and generate a new set of transit routes. Testing on benchmark networks confirmed significant cost savings when considering ES chargers.
The electrification of traditional transit route networks has been a promising option for urban public transit. Compared with fast chargers, energy storage (ES) technology benefits the planner in relation to cost savings and avoiding high electricity demand charges. Although many studies ignored the potentiality of utilizing ES chargers, this study uses this concept with demand charges to design an electric transit route network by proposing a bi-level optimization model. The upper-level model aims to minimize the total travel times of passengers along with the total number of indirect trips. In comparison, the lower-level problem plans to minimize the total costs of purchasing two types of fast and ES chargers and demand charges for the transit network that entirely operates with battery electric buses (BEBs). Because of the NP-hard nature of the proposed model, the discrete multi-objective grey wolf optimizer algorithm is suggested in a discrete space to search for a feasible solution by providing the Pareto frontier of two objective functions. Also, the initial route set generation algorithm has been applied to generate a new set of transit routes. To validate the proposed model, our model has been tested on a benchmark network of Mumford0 in a small and a Fargo-Moorhead area in a medium size. Our results confirmed that considering ES chargers could save 4.8% and 76.5% (for the user cost), 2.3%, and 111.9% (for the operator cost) of the total network and demand charges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available