4.6 Article

Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation in the United States: Changing Trends and Economic Implications

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages E127-E138

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004528

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Biliary complications (BCs) remain a significant issue after liver transplantation, impacting patient and graft survival. This study used real-world evidence to estimate the incidence of BCs after liver transplantation and explore the factors associated with their occurrence. The results showed that BCs increased the risk of posttransplant death and graft loss and significantly added to healthcare costs.
Background.Biliary complications (BCs) continue to impact patient and graft survival after liver transplant (LT), despite improvements in organ preservation, surgical technique, and posttransplant care. Real-world evidence provides a national estimate of the incidence of BC after LT, implications for patient and graft outcomes, and attributable cost not available in transplant registry data. Methods.An administrative health claims-based BC identification algorithm was validated using electronic health records (N = 128) and then applied to nationally linked Medicare and transplant registry claims. Results.The real-world evidence algorithm identified 97% of BCs in the electronic health record review. Nationally, the incidence of BCs within 1 y of LT appears to have improved from 22.2% in 2002 to 20.8% in 2018. Factors associated with BCs include donor type (living versus deceased), recipient age, diagnosis, prior transplant, donor age, and donor cause of death. BCs increased the risk-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for posttransplant death (aHR, 1.43; P < 0.0001) and graft loss (aHR, 1.48; P < 0.0001). Nationally, BCs requiring intervention increased risk-adjusted first-year Medicare spending by $39 710 (P < 0.0001). Conclusions.BCs remain an important cause of morbidity and expense after LT and would benefit from a systematic quality-improvement program.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available