4.5 Article

Effects of antimicrobial metal nanoparticles on characteristics and function properties of mouse mesenchymal stem cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105536

Keywords

Metal nanoparticles; Mesenchymal stem cells; Dose-dependent toxicity; Gene expression; Cytokine production

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoparticles have wide applications in industry and medicine, particularly for their antimicrobial effects. However, a study found that metal antimicrobial nanoparticles have negative effects on mouse mesenchymal stem cells, affecting their characteristics and function properties. It is important to carefully consider the use of metal nanoparticles in tissue regeneration and stem cell therapy.
Nanoparticles (NPs) have a wide use in various field of industry and in medicine, where they represent a promise for their antimicrobial effects. Simultaneous application of NPs and therapeutic stem cells can speed up tissue regeneration and improve healing process but there is a danger of negative impacts of NPs on stem cells. Therefore, we tested effects of four types of metal antimicrobial NPs on characteristics and function properties of mouse mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vitro. All types of tested NPs, i.e. zinc oxide, silver, copper oxide and titanium dioxide, exerted negative effects on the expression of phenotypic markers, metabolic activity, differ-entiation potential, expression of genes for immunoregulatory molecules and on production of cytokines and growth factors by MSCs. However, there were apparent differences in the impact of individual types of NPs on tested characteristics and function properties of MSCs. The results showed that individual types of NPs influence the activity of MSCs, and thus the use of metal NPs during tissue regeneration and in combination with stem cell therapy should be well considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available