4.4 Article

Outcomes of endoscopic full thickness resection in the colon rectum at an Italian tertiary center

Journal

TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02823-0

Keywords

Lateral spreading tumor; Interventional endoscopy; Endoscopic resection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) for colonic lesions. The study found that FTRD is safe and feasible for standard indication, but has a significant recurrence rate, emphasizing the need for close endoscopic follow-up in these patients. In selected cases, multiple EFTR may help achieve complete resection, but with a higher risk of adverse events.
PurposeEndoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an innovative technique for the treatment of colonic lesions not feasible by conventional endoscopic resection. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) for colonic lesions in a high-volume tertiary referral center.MethodsA review of a prospectively collected database on patients that underwent EFTR with FTRD for colonic lesions from June 2016 to January 2021 at our institution was performed. Data regarding the clinical history, previous endoscopic treatments, pathological examination, technical and histological success, and follow-up were evaluated.ResultsThirty-five patients (26 males, median age 69 years) underwent FTRD for colonic lesion. Eighteen lesions were in the left colon, three in the transverse, and 12 in the right colon. The median size of the lesions was 13 (range 10-40) mm. Resection was technically successful in 94% of patients. The mean hospital stay was 3.2 (SD +/- 1.2) days. Adverse events were reported in four cases (11.4%). Histological complete resection (R0) was achieved in 93.9% of cases. Endoscopic follow-up was available in 96.8% of patients, at a median duration of 14.6 months (3-46 months). Recurrence was observed in 19.4% of cases at a median time of 3 months (3-7 months). Five patients had multiple FTRD performed, with R0 resection in three cases. In this subset, adverse events were observed in 40% of cases.ConclusionsFTRD is safe and feasible for standard indication. The non-negligible rate of recurrence observed suggests the need for close endoscopic follow-up in these patients. Multiple EFTR could help achieve complete resection in selected cases; however, in this setting, a higher risk of adverse events was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available