4.4 Article

Is the polarity of the Co3O4(111) surface compensated by electron transfer from bulk donor defects?

Journal

SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 729, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2022.122232

Keywords

Cobalt oxide; Polar surfaces; Charge neutralization; Density-functional theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental studies have shown that the Co3O4(111) surface exists as an unreconstructed (1 x 1) truncated bulk termination. Polarity compensation of this polar surface occurs through a transfer of electrons, which makes the surface metallic. However, this mechanism alone cannot explain the observed reactivity. Therefore, an additional compensation mechanism, involving the transfer of electrons from bulk donor defects to the surface, is proposed.
Experimental studies have shown that the Co3O4(111) surface exists as an unreconstructed (1 x 1) truncated bulk termination. Polarity compensation of this polar surface thus has to occur by a transfer of electrons, which creates partially occupied valence states and makes the surface metallic. Here we show by Hubbard-U corrected density-functional theory calculations that such a polarity compensation mechanism would make the surface highly reactive, which is not in agreement with experimental observations. An additional compensation mechanism has to be at work, by which the partially occupied valence band states are filled by electrons without requiring a reconstruction of the surface. As such an mechanism we propose the transfer of electrons from bulk donor defects to the surface. By employing this mechanism in our calculations we recover the experimentally observed reactivity. This demonstrates that for all polar surfaces, which are fully or partially polarity compensated by the transfer of electrons, additional electronic effects have to be considered in any electronic structure calculation in order to capture the correct surface chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available