4.7 Article

Surface integrity and tribological behavior of 17Cr2Ni2MoVNb steel under combined carburizing treatment and ultrasonic rolling

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 461, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129371

Keywords

Surface integrity; Tribological behavior; Carburized; Ultrasonic surface rolling; Combined treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carburizing combined with ultrasonic surface rolling (USR) was used to reduce the wear rate and coefficient of friction (COF) of a new type gear steel. The microstructure, microhardness, surface morphology, and tribological behavior were studied. The results showed that the combined treatment generated an average surface particle size of 6.67 μm, a microhardness of 918 HV0.2, and a maximum surface compressive residual stress of -468 MPa. The wear rates of carburized specimens and specimens treated with the combined process were 3.16 x 10-15 m3/Nm and 2.98 x 10-15 m3/Nm, respectively. Furthermore, the wear mechanisms differed, with carburized specimens exhibiting three-body wear and specimens treated with the combined process mainly showing adhesive and oxidative wear.
Carburizing combined with ultrasonic surface rolling (USR) were introduced to decrease wear rate and coeffi-cient of friction (COF) of a new type gear steel. Microstructure, microhardness, surface morphology and tribo-logical behavior were investigated. Results indicated that specimens underwent combined treatment can generate average surface particles size of 6.67 mu m, microhardness of 918 HV0.2, maximum surface compressive residual stress was-468 MPa. And wear rate of carburized specimen and specimen underwent combined treatment were 3.16 x 10-15 m3/Nm and 2.98 x 10-15 m3/Nm, respectively. Moreover, wear mechanisms of carburized specimens were three-body wear, and specimens underwent combined treatment mainly exhibited adhesive and oxidative wear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available