4.7 Article

Structural-dependent mechanical behaviors of ink-jet printed films: Indentation testing and phase field fracture modeling

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 468, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129749

Keywords

Ink-jet film; Indentation tests; Thickness; Microstructure; Phase field modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of ink-jet printing in the production of film sensors for gas turbines has great potential. This study investigates the mechanical properties of ink-jet printed films with different thicknesses through indentation tests. Additionally, an anisotropic phase field fracture model is employed to simulate the deformation and cracking mechanisms of ink-jet films with different microstructures. The study emphasizes the evaluation of the accuracy of indentation tests for films with intricate structures, taking into account the effects of thickness and micro-void distributions. This research provides innovative insights into the structural-dependent failure mechanism of ink-jet films, offering a new perspective on the design of films with high mechanical strength.
The utilization of ink-jet printing presents immense potential in the production of film sensors for gas turbines. This study delves into the mechanical properties of ink-jet printed films with varying thickness, through the indentation tests. In addition, the implementation of an anisotropic phase field fracture model enabled the simulation of the deformation and cracking mechanisms of ink-jet films with different microstructures. Emphasis is placed on the evaluation of the accuracy of indentation tests for films with intricate structures, while considering the effects of thickness and micro-void distributions. This study provides innovative insights into the structural-dependent failure mechanism of ink-jet films, offering a new perspective on the design of films with high mechanical strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available