4.7 Review

Complexity testing techniques for time series data: A comprehensive literature review

Journal

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 117-135

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2015.09.002

Keywords

Complexity test; Time series data; Literature review; Fractality; Chaos; Entropy

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (NSFC) [71025005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [91224001, 71433001, 71301006]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in BUCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Complexity may be one of the most important measurements for analysing time series data; it covers or is at least closely related to different data characteristics within nonlinear system theory. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review examining the complexity testing techniques for time series data. According to different features, the complexity measurements for time series data can be divided into three primary groups, i.e., fractality (mono- or multi-fractality) for self-similarity (or system memorability or long-term persistence), methods derived from nonlinear dynamics (via attractor invariants or diagram descriptions) for attractor properties in phase-space, and entropy (structural or dynamical entropy) for the disorder state of a nonlinear system. These estimations analyse time series dynamics from different perspectives but are closely related to or even dependent on each other at the same time. In particular, a weaker self-similarity, a more complex structure of attractor, and a higher-level disorder state of a system consistently indicate that the observed time series data are at a higher level of complexity. Accordingly, this paper presents a historical tour of the important measures and works for each group, as well as ground-breaking and recent applications and future research directions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available