4.4 Article

Three-Step Latent Class Analysis with Inverse Propensity Weighting in the Presence of Differential Item Functioning

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2161384

Keywords

Causal inference; differential item functioning; latent class analysis; measurement non-invariance; propensity score; three-step modelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents an extension of the bias-adjusted three-step latent class analysis with inverse propensity weighting (IPW) to account for differential item function (DIF) caused by treatment or exposure variables. The proposed method includes treatment with its direct effect on the class indicators in the step-one model and incorporates IPW in the step-three model to adjust for classification errors that differ across treatment groups. DIF caused by confounders used to create the propensity scores is found to be less problematic. The newly proposed approach is demonstrated using synthetic and real-life data examples and implemented in Latent GOLD program.
The integration of causal inference techniques such as inverse propensity weighting (IPW) with latent class analysis (LCA) allows for estimating the effect of a treatment on class membership even with observational data. In this article, we present an extension of the bias-adjusted three-step LCA with IPW, which allows accounting for differential item function (DIF) caused by the treatment or exposure variable. Following the approach by Vermunt and Magidson, we propose including treatment with its direct effect on the class indicators in the step-one model. In the step-three model we include the IPW and account for the fact that the classification errors differ across treatment groups. DIF caused by the confounders used to create the propensity scores turns out to be less problematic. Our newly proposed approach is illustrated using a synthetic and a real-life data example and is implemented in the program Latent GOLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available