4.3 Review

Mobile applications in radiation oncology-current choices and future potentials

Journal

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02048-y

Keywords

Electronic patient reported outcome (ePROs); Electronic health (e-health); Smart phone apps; Radiotherapy; Digitalization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the existing scientific literature on mobile applications in the field of radiation oncology and evaluates the characteristics of commercially available apps across different platforms. A systematic review of the literature and searches in major app marketplaces were conducted. The findings show that there is a limited availability of radiation oncology apps for patients and healthcare professionals in common marketplaces, with most apps focusing on supporting healthcare professionals.
PurposeTo review existing scientific literature on mobile applications (apps) in the field of radiation oncology and to evaluate characteristics of commercially available apps across different platforms.MethodsA systematic review of the literature for publications presenting apps in the field of radiation oncology was carried out using the PubMed database, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and annual meetings of major radiation oncology societies. Additionally, the two major marketplaces for apps, App Store and Play Store, were searched for available radiation oncology apps for patients and health care professionals (HCP).ResultsA total of 38 original publications which met the inclusion criteria were identified. Within those publications, 32 apps were developed for patients and 6 for HCP. The vast majority of patient apps focused on documenting electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs). In the two major marketplaces, 26 apps were found, mainly supporting HCP with dose calculations.ConclusionApps used in (and for) scientific research in radiation oncology are rarely available for patients and HCP in common marketplaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available