4.6 Article

Identifying regions of interest in mammogram images

Journal

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 895-903

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09622802231160551

Keywords

Bivariate splines; Cox proportional hazards model; imaging predictor; group lasso; triangulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Screening mammography is crucial for early detection and prevention of breast cancer, but the irregular boundary of breast area in mammograms poses challenges in identifying risk-associated regions. We propose a proportional hazards model with imaging predictors characterized by bivariate splines over triangulation, enforced with group lasso penalty function, to address these challenges and achieve higher discriminatory performance.
Screening mammography is the primary preventive strategy for early detection of breast cancer and an essential input to breast cancer risk prediction and application of prevention/risk management guidelines. Identifying regions of interest within mammogram images that are associated with 5- or 10-year breast cancer risk is therefore clinically meaningful. The problem is complicated by the irregular boundary issue posed by the semi-circular domain of the breast area within mammograms. Accommodating the irregular domain is especially crucial when identifying regions of interest, as the true signal comes only from the semi-circular domain of the breast region, and noise elsewhere. We address these challenges by introducing a proportional hazards model with imaging predictors characterized by bivariate splines over triangulation. The model sparsity is enforced with the group lasso penalty function. We apply the proposed method to the motivating Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort to illustrate important risk patterns and show that the proposed method is able to achieve higher discriminatory performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available