4.6 Article

L-fuzzy generalized neighborhood system-based pessimistic L-fuzzy rough sets and its applications

Journal

SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 7773-7788

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-08088-x

Keywords

Rough set; Fuzzy set; General neighborhood system; Fuzzy pessimistic approximation operator; Three-way decision

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a new type of L-fuzzy generalized neighborhood system is introduced and L-fuzzy rough sets based on it are defined and discussed. The proposed model is verified to be an extension of Pang's generalized neighborhood system-based pessimistic rough sets. The paper also establishes the axiomatic characterizations of the pessimistic L-fuzzy rough sets and presents a reduction theory preserving L-fuzzy approximation operators.
In this paper, a new type of L-fuzzy generalized neighborhood system is introduced and then novel L-fuzzy rough sets based on it are defined and discussed. It is verified that the proposed model is an extension of Pang's generalized neighborhood system-based pessimistic rough sets and so called L-fuzzy generalized neighborhood system-based pessimistic L-fuzzy rough sets. Firstly, the basic properties of the novel model are studied. To regain some Pawlak's properties which are lost in the novel model, the serial, reflexive, transitive and symmetric conditions for L-fuzzy general neighborhood systems are defined. Secondly, the axiomatic characterizations of the pessimistic L-fuzzy rough sets and that generated by serial, reflexive and symmetric L-fuzzy general neighborhood systems are given, respectively. Thirdly, a reduction theory preserving L-fuzzy approximation operators is established. Finally, one applied in information system, i.e., a new three-way decision model based on pessimistic L-fuzzy rough sets, is built. To show the effectiveness and reliability of our model, a practical example is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available