4.7 Article

Investigating the environmental impacts of different direct material recycling and battery remanufacturing technologies on two types of retired lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles in China

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122966

Keywords

Life cycle assessment; Lithium-ion batteries; Direct recycling; Remanufacturing; Environmental impacts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles is a meaningful way to alleviate the global resource crisis and supply chain risks. This study examines the environmental impacts of different advanced recycling technologies for NCM and LFP batteries. The results show that direct material recycling methods can significantly reduce the environmental burden compared to hydrometallurgy, and the environmental benefits of battery remanufacturing increase with the amount of materials obtained through recycling.
Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles is a meaningful way to alleviate the global resource crisis and supply chain risks. However, the environmental impacts caused by different advanced recycling technologies of batteries have not been extensively discussed. This study conducts a process-based life cycle assessment for three typical direct recycling methods and a hydrometallurgical recycling method for the lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. Then, the potential of reducing the envi-ronmental burden through battery remanufacturing with recycled materials is investigated. The results show that the environmental burden of direct material recycling of NCM and LFP batteries is reduced by more than 10% and 30% compared with that of hydrometallurgy. Most environmental indicators of NCM are higher than those of LFP during the recycling process due to the difference auxiliary materials and recycled products. If only cathode materials and foils are recycled, the smallest environmental difference between NCM and LFP is only 1.6%. Compared with batteries manufactured with raw materials, the environmental impacts of NCM and LFP batteries remanufactured with recycled materials can be reduced by more than 20% and 32%. Moreover, the more battery materials obtained by the direct material recycling routes, the greater the environmental benefits through battery remanufacturing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available