4.7 Article

Improved negative charge of tight ceramic ultrafiltration membranes for protein-resistant and easy-cleaning performance

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 309, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.123082

Keywords

Tight ultrafiltration membranes; Ceramic membrane; Protein resistance; Polyacrylic acid; Surface modification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a negative ZrO2 tubular ceramic membrane was modified by grafting polyacrylic acid (PAA) to mitigate protein fouling. The modified membrane showed higher stable normalized flux and flux recovery ratio, indicating improved protein-resistant and easy-cleaning performance.
Fouling caused by adsorption is a challenge in protein separation and purification using membrane technology. The interaction between the membrane surface and proteins is significant for developing antifouling modified membranes. In this study, a negative ZrO2 tubular ceramic membrane was constructed by grafting polyacrylic acid (PAA) to mitigate protein fouling. PAA of 2000 Da had little effect on the membrane pore and surface wettability, as characterized by XPS, dextran retention, contact angle, and water permeance. The protein resistance of the modified membrane was investigated by protein filtration. The modified membranes had a higher stable normalized flux (0.6) and flux recovery ratio (90 %) than that of the original membrane. In addition, the performance of the modified membranes was sensitive to the pore sizes of the original membranes. When the original membrane was unable to completely reject bovine serum albumin (BSA), the weak interaction between BSA and the membrane pores would reduce rejection after PAA modification. And the flux recovery ratio of modified membrane increased by 55 %. Overall, PAA modification reduces irreversible fouling by electrostatic repulsion, and improves the protein-resistant and easy-cleaning performance of ceramic membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available