4.6 Article

An improved RANSAC based on the scale variation homogeneity

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.08.019

Keywords

Scale variation homogeneity; Scale ratio; RANSAC; SIFT matches

Funding

  1. National 863 Program [2014AA015104]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [61370124]
  3. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [61125206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For random sample consensus (RANSAC) method, high levels of contamination may slow down its convergence and impede the acquisition of the optimal model. In this paper, an improved RANSAC algorithm based on SIFT matches is proposed, which could provide robust performance in high levels of contamination and with low computational complexity. The improved RANSAC algorithm is particularly tailored to planar homography, by appropriately exploring feature scales. Firstly, a new feature scale constraint, i.e., the scale variation homogeneity (SVH), is proposed by exploiting the fact that the feature scale ratio of a correct match is approximate to the actual scale variation of two matched images. As a result, the potential correct and false matches can be effectively determined by SVH. Secondly, each model is scored by the number of partial identified false matches instead of all correct matches, which will speed up the evaluation process. Finally, fast converge can be obtained by adaptive selection of the test set for determining termination criterion according to the levels of contamination. Experimental results have demonstrated that the proposed SVH-RANSAC algorithm can perform very well even in the scenario of 90% contamination level. The number of iterations could be decreased by at least 35% and computational complexity for the evaluation procedure could be decreased by at least 2.5% compared with the LOPRANSAC. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available