4.6 Article

The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23104820

Keywords

wireless dual force plate system; force-time; vertical jump; hardware; concurrent validity; agreement; accuracy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Force plate testing is becoming more popular in sports due to the availability of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems. This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of the HD wireless dual force plate hardware for assessing vertical jumps. The results showed that the HD system can be considered a valid alternative to the industry gold standard for assessing vertical jumps.
Force plate testing is becoming more commonplace in sport due to the advent of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems (i.e., hardware and software). Following the validation of the Hawkin Dynamics Inc. (HD) proprietary software in recent literature, the aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the HD wireless dual force plate hardware for assessing vertical jumps. During a single testing session, the HD force plates were placed directly atop two adjacent Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc. in-ground force plates (the gold standard) to simultaneously collect vertical ground reaction forces produced by 20 participants (27 +/- 6 years, 85 +/- 14 kg, 176.5 +/- 9.23 cm) during the countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) tests (1000 Hz). Agreement between force plate systems was determined via ordinary least products regression using bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. No bias was present between the two force plate systems for any of the CMJ and DJ variables, except DJ peak braking force (proportional bias) and DJ peak braking power (fixed and proportional bias). The HD system may be considered a valid alternative to the industry gold standard for assessing vertical jumps because fixed or proportional bias was identified for none of the CMJ variables (n = 17) and only 2 out of 18 DJ variables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available