4.6 Article

Fast Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images Using a Network That Integrates Global and Local Information

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23115310

Keywords

remote sensing images; semantic segmentation; global and local information

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers proposed Fast-GLNet, which enhances feature fusion and segmentation processes by incorporating the DFPA module and IFS module. Compared to GLNet, Fast-GLNet achieves a higher mIoU of 72.1% and reduces GPU memory usage from 1865 MB to 1639 MB on the Deepglobe dataset.
Efficient processing of ultra-high-resolution images is increasingly sought after with the continuous advancement of photography and sensor technology. However, the semantic segmentation of remote sensing images lacks a satisfactory solution to optimize GPU memory utilization and the feature extraction speed. To tackle this challenge, Chen et al. introduced GLNet, a network designed to strike a better balance between GPU memory usage and segmentation accuracy when processing high-resolution images. Building upon GLNet and PFNet, our proposed method, Fast-GLNet, further enhances the feature fusion and segmentation processes. It incorporates the double feature pyramid aggregation (DFPA) module and IFS module for local and global branches, respectively, resulting in superior feature maps and optimized segmentation speed. Extensive experimentation demonstrates that Fast-GLNet achieves faster semantic segmentation while maintaining segmentation quality. Additionally, it effectively optimizes GPU memory utilization. For example, compared to GLNet, Fast-GLNet's mIoU on the Deepglobe dataset increased from 71.6% to 72.1%, and GPU memory usage decreased from 1865 MB to 1639 MB. Notably, Fast-GLNet surpasses existing general-purpose methods, offering a superior trade-off between speed and accuracy in semantic segmentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available