4.6 Article

A Deep Learning Image System for Classifying High Oleic Sunflower Seed Varieties

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23052471

Keywords

classification system; convolutional neural network; high oleic sunflower seed

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to examine the capacity of deep learning algorithms in classifying sunflower seeds. An image acquisition system was used to take photos of 6000 seeds of six sunflower seed varieties. The CNN AlexNet model achieved an accuracy of 100% for two classes and 89.5% for the six classes, indicating the usefulness of deep learning algorithms in classifying high oleic sunflower seeds.
Sunflower seeds, one of the main oilseeds produced around the world, are widely used in the food industry. Mixtures of seed varieties can occur throughout the supply chain. Intermediaries and the food industry need to identify the varieties to produce high-quality products. Considering that high oleic oilseed varieties are similar, a computer-based system to classify varieties could be useful to the food industry. The objective of our study is to examine the capacity of deep learning (DL) algorithms to classify sunflower seeds. An image acquisition system, with controlled lighting and a Nikon camera in a fixed position, was constructed to take photos of 6000 seeds of six sunflower seed varieties. Images were used to create datasets for training, validation, and testing of the system. A CNN AlexNet model was implemented to perform variety classification, specifically classifying from two to six varieties. The classification model reached an accuracy value of 100% for two classes and 89.5% for the six classes. These values can be considered acceptable, because the varieties classified are very similar, and they can hardly be classified with the naked eye. This result proves that DL algorithms can be useful for classifying high oleic sunflower seeds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available