4.6 Article

Decision Support System Proposal for Medical Evacuations in Military Operations

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23115144

Keywords

enterprise architecture; decision support system; medical evacuation; vital signs measurement; biomedical signals measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The area of military operations presents a significant challenge for medical support, and the ability to quickly evacuate wounded soldiers is crucial. This paper introduces the architecture of an electronically supported decision support system for medical evacuation during military operations, which can also be used by other services such as police or fire service.
The area of military operations is a big challenge for medical support. A particularly important factor that allows medical services to react quickly in the case of mass casualties is the ability to rapidly evacuation of wounded soldiers from a battlefield. To meet this requirement, an effective medical evacuation system is essential. The paper presented the architecture of the electronically supported decision support system for medical evacuation during military operations. The system can also be used by other services such as police or fire service. The system meets the requirements for tactical combat casualty care procedures and is composed of following elements: measurement subsystem, data transmission subsystem and analysis and inference subsystem. The system, based on the continuous monitoring of selected soldiers' vital signs and biomedical signals, automatically proposes a medical segregation of wounded soldiers (medical triage). The information on the triage was visualized using the Headquarters Management System for medical personnel (first responders, medical officers, medical evacuation groups) and for commanders, if required. All elements of the architecture were described in the paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available