4.7 Article

A global snapshot of microplastic contamination in sediments and biota of marine protected areas

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 865, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161293

Keywords

Ocean; Marine debris; Conservation; Environmental impacts; GIS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a comprehensive overview of the occurrence, abundance, and distribution of microplastics (MPs) in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) worldwide, highlighting the potential impacts on these areas. MPs were found in 186 MPAs, with concentrations varying in sediment and biota samples. The findings raise urgent concerns about the effectiveness of the global system of protected areas and their proposed conservation goals.
Microplastics (MPs) become ubiquitous contaminants in Marine Protected Areas (MPA) that have been planned as a conservation strategy. The present study provides a comprehensive overview of the occurrence, abundance, and distribution of MPs potentially affecting MPA worldwide. Data on MP occurrence and levels in sediment and biota samples were collected from recent peer-reviewed literature and screened using a GIS-based approach overlapping MP records with MPA boundaries. MPs were found in 186 MPAs, with levels ranging from 0 to 9187.5 items/kg in sediment and up to 17,461.9 items/kg in organisms. Peaked MPs concentrations occurred within multiple-use areas, and no-take MPAs were also affected. About half of MP levels found within MPA fell into the higher concentration quartiles, suggesting potential impacts on these areas. In general, benthic species were likely more affected than pelagic ones due to the higher concentrations of MP reported in the tissues of benthic species. Alarmingly, MPs were found in tissues of two threatened species on the IUCN Red List. The findings denote urgent concerns about the effectiveness of the global system of protected areas and their proposed conservation goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available