Journal
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-023-00431-7
Keywords
Responsible conduct of research; Doctoral training; Dialogical skills; Moral dilemmas; Research integrity; Moral case deliberation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this paper, the authors demonstrate the value of using Moral Case Deliberation, a case reflection method, in teaching responsible conduct of research (RCR) to PhD students. This method helps students become aware of and internalize RCR principles and values, reflect on their own conduct in daily practice, and develop dialogical skills for discussing RCR issues. By focusing on values and personal motivations, reflecting on real experiences and dilemmas, and cultivating participants' dialogical skills, this method supports students in acting responsibly and pursuing RCR in their research practice.
Teaching responsible conduct of research (RCR) to PhD students is crucial for fostering responsible research practice. In this paper, we show how the use of Moral Case Deliberation-a case reflection method used in the Amsterdam UMC RCR PhD course-is particularity valuable to address three goals of RCR education: (1) making students aware of, and internalize, RCR principles and values, (2) supporting reflection on good conduct in personal daily practice, and (3) developing students' dialogical attitude and skills so that they can deliberate on RCR issues when they arise. What makes this method relevant for RCR education is the focus on values and personal motivations, the structured reflection on real experiences and dilemmas and the cultivation of participants' dialogical skills. During these structured conversations, students reflect on the personal motives that drive them to adhere to the principles of good science, thereby building connections between those principles and their personal values and motives. Moreover, by exploring personal questions and dilemmas related to RCR, they learn how to address these with colleagues and supervisors. The reflection on personal experiences with RCR issues and questions combined with the study of relevant normative frameworks, support students to act responsibly and to pursue RCR in their day-to-day research practice in spite of difficulties and external constraints.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available