Journal
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-023-00430-8
Keywords
COVID-19; Pandemic; Research; Principal investigator; Ethics; Decisions
Ask authors/readers for more resources
During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, principal investigators faced challenges in making decisions regarding research personnel and environments. A survey revealed that PIs prioritized the well-being and perspectives of research personnel but experienced difficulties and stress. Early-career faculty showed higher concerns about career and productivity, faced more barriers and stress, and had lower satisfaction with their decisions. Women expressed higher interpersonal concerns and reported greater stress than men.
At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, stay-at-home orders disrupted normal research operations. Principal investigators (PIs) had to make decisions about conducting and staffing essential research under unprecedented, rapidly changing conditions. These decisions also had to be made amid other substantial work and life stressors, like pressures to be productive and staying healthy. Using survey methods, we asked PIs funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation (N = 930) to rate how they prioritized different considerations, such as personal risks, risks to research personnel, and career consequences, when making decisions. They also reported how difficult they found these choices and associated symptoms of stress. Using a checklist, PIs indicated those factors in their research environments that made their decisions easier (i.e., facilitators) or more difficult (i.e., barriers) to make. Finally, PIs also indicated how satisfied they were with their decisions and management of research during the disruption. Descriptive statistics summarize PIs' responses and inferential tests explore whether responses varied by academic rank or gender. PIs overall reported prioritizing the well-being and perspectives of research personnel, and they perceived more facilitators than barriers. Early-career faculty, however, rated concerns about their careers and productivity as higher priorities compared to their senior counterparts. Early-career faculty also perceived greater difficulty and stress, more barriers, fewer facilitators, and had less satisfaction with their decisions. Women rated several interpersonal concerns about their research personnel more highly than men and reported greater stress. The experience and perceptions of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform policies and practices when planning for future crises and recovering from the pandemic.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available