Between-occupation differences in work-related COVID-19 mitigation strategies over time: Analysis of the Virus Watch Cohort in England and Wales

Objectives COVID-19 mitigations have had a profound impact on workplaces, however, multisectoral com-parisons of how work-related mitigations were applied are limited. This study aimed to investigate (i) occupa-tional differences in the usage of key work-related mitigations over time and (ii) workers' perceptions of these mitigations.Methods Employed/self-employed Virus Watch study participants (N=6279) responded to a mitigation-related online survey covering the periods of December 2020-February 2022. Logistic regression was used to investigate occupation-and time-related differences in the usage of work-related mitigation methods. Participants' percep-tions of mitigation methods were investigated descriptively using proportions.Results Usage of work-related mitigation methods differed between occupations and over time, likely reflecting variation in job roles, workplace environments, legislation and guidance. Healthcare workers had the highest predicted probabilities for several mitigations, including reporting frequent hand hygiene [predicted probability across all survey periods 0.61 (95% CI 0.56-0.66)] and always wearing face coverings [predicted probability range 0.71 (95% CI 0.66-0.75) - 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84) across survey periods]. There were significant cross-occupational trends towards reduced mitigations during periods of less stringent national restrictions. The major-ity of participants across occupations (55-88%) agreed that most mitigations were reasonable and worthwhile even after the relaxation of national restrictions; agreement was lower for physical distancing (39-44%).Conclusions While usage of work-related mitigations appeared to vary alongside stringency of national restric-tions, agreement that most mitigations were reasonable and worthwhile remained substantial. Further investiga-tion into the factors underlying between-occupational differences could assist pandemic planning and prevention of workplace COVID-19 transmission.

Automated summary

This study investigated the usage of work-related mitigations and workers' perceptions of these mitigations among different occupations and over time. The results showed variations in the usage of these mitigations among occupations and during different periods, with healthcare workers having the highest probabilities of using these measures. Most participants agreed that most mitigations were reasonable and worthwhile even after the relaxation of national restrictions.