4.5 Article

Addressing time discrepancy between digital and physical twins

Journal

ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2022.104347

Keywords

Available online xxxx; Cyber-physical systems; Digital twins; Modelling; Time delays; Synchronisation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digital twins (DTs) are a crucial technology for the development, real-time monitoring, and optimization of cyber-physical systems (CPSs). This paper presents an approach to handle situations where a DT and its physical twin (PT) get out of sync, providing user notification, degradation of DT to digital shadow (DS), and recovery mechanisms to re-establish synchronization between DT and PT.
Digital twins (DTs) represent a key technology in the development, real-time monitoring and optimisation of cyber-physical systems (CPSs). Such potential emerges as a result of the real-time coupling between DTs and their physical counterparts, where it is possible to make use of operational data as it is being generated in order to aid decision-making. Harnessing this potential presents several design challenges, such as the parallel operation of the DT and its physical twin (PT), and the necessary synchronisation thereof, to ensure coherent execution of the system in ensemble. In this paper we present an approach that handles situations where a DT and its PT get out of sync as a result of disturbances in the normal operational conditions of the DT-PT system, e.g., due to network degradation or temporary network drop. The purpose is to provide a best-effort functionality covering: user notification, degradation of DT to digital shadow (DS), with recovery mechanisms to re-establish the synchronisation between DT and PT. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available