4.6 Review

Biologics for severe asthma-Which, when and why?

Journal

RESPIROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 709-721

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/resp.14520

Keywords

asthma; asthma control; biologics; biologics switching; biomarkers; exacerbations; remission; severe asthma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory condition affecting around 350 million people worldwide, with 5%-10% classified as severe cases. The management goal is to control symptoms, reduce exacerbations, and diminish corticosteroid-related morbidity. The advent of biologics has brought about a revolution in the treatment of severe asthma, particularly for those with type-2 mediated immunity. However, biologics are not a universal solution and there is still a significant unmet clinical need. This review explores the pathogenesis of asthma, different phenotypes, current and future biologic agents, selection and evaluation of biologic therapies.
Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory condition of the airways that affects about 350 million people globally. In 5%-10% of individuals, it is severe, with considerable morbidity and high health care utilization. The goal of asthma management is disease control by reducing symptoms and exacerbations and reducing corticosteroid-related morbidity. The era of biologics has revolutionized the management of severe asthma. Biologics have changed our expectations for severe asthma, especially in those people with type-2 mediated immunity. We can now explore the potential for changing disease trajectory and inducing remission. However, biologics are not a panacea for all severe asthma sufferers and despite their success there remains substantial unmet clinical need. We review the pathogenesis of asthma, phenotyping the heterogeneity of asthma, currently licensed and future biologic agents, how to choose the initial biologic, assessing the response, remission and switching of biologic therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available