4.5 Review

The Effectiveness and Safety of Exenatide Versus Metformin in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 2349-2361

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01222-y

Keywords

Exenatide; Metformin; Obesity; Reproductive function; Polycystic ovary syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disorder that affects women of childbearing age, causing reproductive dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia, and obesity. This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness and safety of exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, with metformin, an insulin sensitizer, in treating PCOS patients. The results showed that exenatide was more effective in increasing pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, decreasing body mass index, and improving insulin resistance compared to metformin. However, more high-quality studies are needed to provide stronger evidence for the use of exenatide in this patient population.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disorder that affects women of childbearing age, resulting in reproductive dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia, and obesity. While several drugs are currently approved for use in these patients, their relative effectiveness remains controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the reproductive efficacy and safety of exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, versus metformin, an insulin sensitizer, in the treatment of patients with PCOS. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, comprising 785 PCOS patients, of whom 385 received exenatide and 400 received metformin. Compared with metformin, exenatide was significantly more effective in treating these patients, as demonstrated by increased pregnancy rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28 to 2.92, P = 0.002), greater ovulation rate (RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.80, P = 0.004), decreased body mass index (mean difference = - 1.72 kg/m(2), 95% CI - 2.27 to - 1.18, P = 0.00001), and improved insulin resistance (standard mean difference = - 0.62, 95% CI - 0.91 to - 0.33, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events (gastrointestinal reactions, hypoglycemia, etc.) between the two therapies. However, given the moderate to high quality and possible bias of the included studies, the available evidence is inconclusive. More high-quality studies are needed to assess the effects of exenatide in order to provide stronger evidence for its use in this patient population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available