4.7 Article

Energy consumption within policy uncertainty: Considering the climate and economic factors

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 567-576

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.098

Keywords

Renewable energy; Non-renewable energy; Climate policy uncertainty; Economic policy uncertainty; Rolling window causality test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the relationship between renewable energy consumption (REC), non-renewable energy consumption (NEC), and policy uncertainties. The findings suggest that the causality between REC and climate policy uncertainty (CPU) is dependent on the authorities' attitude towards climate change. Similarly, the nexus between NEC and CPU is mainly positive, except during global financial crises. Economic policy uncertainty (EPU) has a negative impact on REC, while it has a positive impact on NEC, indicating the convenience and low cost of non-renewable energy during economic downturns.
Climate and economic policy are closely correlated with energy consumption. This study investigates the bidirectional causality between renewable (REC) and non-renewable energy consumption (NEC) and policy uncertainties. The time-varying bootstrap rolling window causality test considers structural changes and parameter instability. The results show that the causality between REC and climate policy uncertainty (CPU) is both negative and positive, which mainly stems from the attitudes of authorities towards climate change. If the Administration is positive for climate change mitigation, the correlation between REC and CPU is positive; otherwise, it is negative. The nexus between NEC and CPU is mainly positive, except during global financial crisis periods. This reflects that climate policies are affected by financial crises due to financial constraints. For comparison, we further analyse the dynamic correlation between energy consumption and economic policy uncertainty (EPU). EPU has a significant negative impact on REC in most subperiods, while it has a positive impact on NEC. This can be explained by the fact that non-renewable energy is cheap and convenient to use during economic downturns. Moreover, crude oil has strategic reserve value, especially in the turmoil periods. Regarding policy implications, harmonious and coherent climate and economic policies are important for energy transition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available