4.7 Article

Glasgow climate change conference (COP26) and its implications in sub-Sahara Africa economies

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 214-222

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.054

Keywords

SDGs; Clean technologies; Renewable energy; Institutions; COP26 agreement; Climate change action; Sub -Sahara Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of economic growth, institutional quality, foreign direct investment, and financial development on renewable energy in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The findings suggest that economic growth and financial development have a positive significant relationship with renewable energy, while foreign direct investment and institutional quality have a negative significant influence on renewable energy.
Alternative energy has been hailed as a feasible resolution to the environmental degradation and energy problems that have plagued Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) recently. The expansion of the clean energy sector, on the other hand, relies on economic growth, effective governance, and financial considerations. As a result, it is important to investigate the links between these variables in SSA. This study investigated the influence of economic growth, institutional quality, foreign direct investment (FDI), and financial development on renewable energy at the national threshold in SSA using a two-step difference GMM model based on panel data collected from 2002 to 2019. The outcome shows that economic growth and all three financial development indicators (FD1, FD2 and FD3) have a positive significant relationship with renewable energy. Furthermore, for SSA countries, FDI, as well as all six proxy factors for institutional quality, had a negative significant influence on renewable energy. Our empirical findings propose a variety of policies that might help the renewable energy sector grow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available