Journal
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113246
Keywords
Energy system modeling; Sector-coupling; Life-cycle assessment (LCA); Environmental impact; Carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS); Mathematical optimization; Carbon dioxide removal; Negative emissions; Direct air capture (DAC)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Carbon capture and storage can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide negative emissions for the transition to a net-zero society. Combining energy system modeling with life-cycle assessment, this study analyzes the economic and environmental impacts of carbon dioxide storage on the transition to net-zero emissions. The results show that increasing carbon dioxide storage beyond the minimum requirement can significantly lower costs and environmental impacts, offering economic and environmental benefits in the transition to net-zero energy systems.
Carbon capture and storage can both reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide negative emissions to contribute to the transition to a net-zero society. The contribution of carbon capture and storage has been investigated within cross-sectorial energy system models. However, such models commonly focus on cost and greenhouse gas emissions, while broader environmental impacts are investigated for individual technologies only. Here, we analyze economic and environmental impacts of the transition to net-zero emissions by combining energy system modeling with life-cycle assessment. We focus on the system-wide implications of carbon dioxide storage on economic or environmental impacts. In our investigation of the transition of the German energy system until 2045, net-zero emissions require a minimal amount of carbon capture and storage. However, increasing carbon dioxide storage beyond the minimum amount significantly lowers cost and environmental impacts in up to 13 out of 16 impact categories by avoiding investments into material-intensive technologies, such as power-to-methane or renewable power plants in areas with low generation potential. In scenarios without electricity imports, carbon dioxide storage ranges between 118 Mt to 379 Mt in 2045 with cost increasing by 105% when carbon dioxide storage is minimized. 84% of the cost increase is incurred for eliminating the final 23 Mt of carbon dioxide stored. The benefits of applying carbon capture and storage are robust to variations in the amount of renewable electricity imports and residual emissions that require compensation. Hence, the results suggest that carbon capture and storage can offer economic and environmental benefits in the transition to net-zero energy systems beyond greenhouse gas emission mitigation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available