4.7 Article

Design lignin doped with nitrogen and phosphorus for flame retardant phenolic foam materials

Journal

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2023.105535

Keywords

Lignin; Phenolic foam; Flame retardancy; Thermal degradation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a nitrogen-phosphorus doped lignin flame retardant (NP-LMDL) was prepared and used to partially replace phenol in phenolic foam to prepare flame retardant phenolic foams (NP-LMDLPFx). The nitrogen-phosphorus doped lignin enhanced the flame retardant performance and compressive strength of the foam.
Developing lignin-based flame retardants for phenolic foam with exceptional flame retardancy and mechanical performances remains a huge challenge due to complicated chemical structure and unstable chemical activity of lignin. In this study, nitrogen-phosphorus doped lignin flame retardant (NP-LMDL) was prepared by modifying reactive lignin with 9,10-dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DOPO) and triethylenetetramine (TETA), which was utilized to partially replace phenol to prepare flame retardant phenolic foams (NP-LMDLPFx). The results showed that nitrogen-phosphorus doped lignin enhanced the flame retardant performance and compressive strength of the foam. The limiting oxygen index (LOI) and compressive strength of NP-LMDLPF15 increased by 33.3% and 43.7% comparing with pure phenolic foam (PF). The peak heat release rate (pHRR) and peak smoke release rate (pRSR) decreased by 48.0% and 53.2%. Moreover, the structure and elemental constitution of char residues were analyzed to discuss the flame retardant mechanism of nitrogen and phos-phorus in foam. Nitrogen and phosphorus in NP-LMDLPFx worked together to promote polymers carbonization and generate rich nitrogen and phosphorus char residue layer, insulate heat and oxygen to play the role of flame retardant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available