4.7 Article

Voluntary versus mechanically-induced deep inspiration breath-hold for left breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109598

Keywords

Mechanical ventilation; Deep inspiration breath-hold; Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; Mean heart dose

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of mechanically-induced DIBH and SGRT-guided voluntary DIBH in breast radiotherapy. The results showed that mechanically-induced DIBH performed better in protecting and repositioning critical organs while achieving similar target irradiation accuracy as SGRT.
Background and purpose: Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) protects critical organs-at-risk (OARs) for adjuvant breast radiotherapy. Guidance systems e.g. surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) improve the positional breast reproducibility and stability during DIBH. In parallel, OARs sparing with DIBH is enhanced through different techniques e.g. prone position, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). By inducing repeated DIBH with the same level of positive pressure, mechanically-assisted and non-invasive ventilation (MANIV) could potentially combine these DIBH optimizations. Materials and Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, multicenter and single-institution non-inferiority trial. Sixty-six patients eligible for adjuvant left whole-breast radiotherapy in supine position were equally assigned between mechanically-induced DIBH (MANIV-DIBH) and voluntary DIBH guided by SGRT (sDIBH). The co-primary endpoints were positional breast stability and reproducibility with a non-inferiority margin of 1 mm. Secondary endpoints were tolerance assessed daily via validated scales, treatment time, dose to OARs and their inter-fraction positional reproducibility. Results: Differences between both arms for positional breast reproducibility and stability occurred at a sub-millimetric level (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). The left anterior descending artery near-max dose (14,6 +/- 12,0 Gy vs. 7,7 +/- 7,1 Gy, p = 0,018) and mean dose (5,0 +/- 3,5 Gy vs. 3,0 +/- 2,0 Gy, p = 0,009) were improved with MANIV-DIBH. The same applied for the V5Gy of the left ventricle (2,4 +/- 4,1 % vs. 0,8 +/- 1,6 %, p = 0,001) as well as for the left lung V20Gy (11,4 +/- 2,8 % vs. 9,7 +/- 2,7 %, p = 0,019) and V30Gy (8,0 +/- 2,6 % vs. 6,5 +/- 2,3 %, p = 0,0018). Better heart's inter-fraction positional reproducibility was observed with MANIV-DIBH. Tolerance and treatment time were similar. Conclusion: Mechanical ventilation provides the same target irradiation accuracy as with SGRT while bet -ter protecting and repositioning OARs. (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 183 (2023) 1-9

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available