4.7 Article

Dosimetric benefit of a library of plans versus single-plan strategy for pre-operative gastric cancer radiotherapy

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109582

Keywords

Adaptive radiotherapy; Gastric cancer; Library of plans; Dose accumulation; CBCT guidance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the dosimetric benefit of a library of plans (LoP) compared to the traditional single-plan (SP) strategy for pre-operative gastric radiotherapy. The results show that the LoP strategy reduces the average planning target volume (PTV) and decreases the dose to organs-at-risk (OARs), potentially reducing radiation-induced toxicities.
Background and purpose: The stomach experiences large volume and shape changes during pre-operative gastric radiotherapy. This study evaluates the dosimetric benefit for organs-at-risk (OARs) of a library of plans (LoP) compared to the traditional single-plan (SP) strategy.Materials and methods: Twelve patients who received SP CBCT-guided pre-operative gastric radiotherapy (45 Gy; 25 fractions) were included. Clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of CTVstomach (i.e., stomach + 10 mm uniform margin minus OARs) and CTVLN (i.e., regional lymph node stations). For LoP, five stomach volumes (approximately equidistant with fixed volumes) were created using a previously developed stomach deformation model (volume = 150-750 mL). Appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated for CTVstomach (SP and LoP, separately) and CTVLN. Treatment plans were automatically generated/optimized and the best-fitting library plan was manually selected for each daily CBCT. OARs (i.e., liver, kidneys, heart, spleen, spinal canal) doses were accumulated and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were evaluated.Results: The non-isotropic PTVstomach margins were significantly (p < 0.05) smaller for LoP than SP (me-dian = 13.1 vs 19.8 mm). For each patient, the average PTV was smaller using a LoP (difference range 134- 1151 mL). For all OARs except the kidneys, DVH parameters were significantly reduced using a LoP. Differences in mean dose (Dmean) for liver, heart and spleen ranged between-1.8 to 5.7 Gy. For LoP, a benefit of heart Dmean > 4 Gy and spleen Dmean > 2 Gy was found in 4 and 5 patients, respectively.Conclusion: A LoP strategy for pre-operative gastric cancer reduced average PTV and reduced OAR dose compared to a SP strategy, thereby potentially reducing risks for radiation-induced toxicities.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology xxx (2023) xxx-xxx This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available