4.7 Article

The latest Early Pleistocene hippopotami from the human-bearing locality of Buia (Eritrea)

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108039

Keywords

Hippopotamidae; Morphology; Morphometry; Paleobiogeography; Biochronology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study re-analyses and describes the hippopotamid fossil material from Buia (Eritrea), aiming to clarify the presence of different species and provide new data on their distribution. The results reveal the presence of Hippopotamus gorgops and aff. Hippopotamus karumensis, and suggest a revision of the Northern African and Levantine Hippopotamidae records.
Hippopotamids represent a common element within the large mammal assemblages in the Pleistocene of Africa. However, fossil hippopotamus taxonomy, distribution and relationships are highly controversial and their occurrences in East Africa need to be deeply revised. In this framework, the hippopotamid material from the human-bearing locality of Buia (Eritrea) is here re-analysed and described in order to clarify the presence of small- and large-sized species and to provide new data on the chronological and geographic distribution of the recognised taxa. Morphological and morphometric analyses reveal the presence of Hippopotamus gorgops and aff. Hippopotamus karumensis within the fossil assemblages of the Danakil Depression and provide new characters for taxonomic discrimination between the two taxa. The record from Buia represents the northernmost and one of the youngest occurrence of aff. H. karumensis in Africa, suggesting a careful revision of the Northern African and Levantine Hippopotamidae records. Furthermore, 3D models of key specimens from Buia are provided for the first time, representing an important step in digitalization of fossil Eastern African collection and specimens.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available