4.6 Article

In Vivo Examination of Mouse APOBEC3-and Human APOBEC3A-and APOBEC3G-Mediated Restriction of Parvovirus and Herpesvirus Infection in Mouse Models

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 17, Pages 8005-8012

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00973-16

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. HHS \ National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 CA029303, R01 AI085015, T32-CA115299, F32-AI100512]
  2. amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research (amfAR) [108993-57-RKHF]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [13J05281]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13J05281] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

APOBEC3 knockout and human APOBEC3A and -3G transgenic mice were tested for their ability to be infected by the herpesviruses herpes simplex virus 1 and murine herpesvirus 68 and the parvovirus minute virus of mice (MVM). Knockout, APOBEC3A and APOBEC3G transgenic, and wild-type mice were equally infected by the herpesviruses, while APOBEC3A but not mouse APOBEC3 conferred resistance to MVM. No viruses showed evidence of cytidine deamination by mouse or human APOBEC3s. These data suggest that in vitro studies implicating APOBEC3 proteins in virus resistance may not reflect their role in vivo. IMPORTANCE It is well established that APOBEC3 proteins in different species are a critical component of the host antiretroviral defense. Whether these proteins also function to inhibit other viruses is not clear. There have been a number of in vitro studies suggesting that different APOBEC3 proteins restrict herpesviruses and parvoviruses, among others, but whether they also work in vivo has not been demonstrated. Our studies looking at the role of mouse and human APOBEC3 proteins in transgenic and knockout mouse models of viral infection suggest that these restriction factors are not broadly antiviral and demonstrate the importance of testing their activity in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available