4.7 Article

Niche conservatism and ecological change during the Late Devonian mass extinction

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2524

Keywords

brachiopod; Kellwasser events; Appalachian Basin; ecological gradient; palaeoecology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of the fossil record can provide insights into the causes and effects of mass extinctions. This study examines ecological changes resulting from a Late Devonian mass extinction event using brachiopod fossils. The extinction led to the replacement of species by new immigrant taxa, but survivors showed niche conservatism along ecological gradients. Despite ecological stability, there were significant taxonomic and ecological changes in the regional species pool before and after the extinction.
Studies of the fossil record can inform our understanding of not only the causes of mass extinctions, but also their effects on biodiversity, ecology and evolution. Here, we examine regional-scale ecological changes resulting from a Late Devonian mass extinction event using brachiopod fossil assemblages from the Appalachian Basin. About half of the species went extinct, but were largely replaced by new immigrant taxa. Both before and after the extinction, the primary gradient in faunal composition was correlated with onshore-offshore position, with a second gradient attributed to frequency of disturbance. Survivors of the extinction displayed a strong degree of niche conservatism along these gradients. Despite these indicators of ecological stability, the pre- and post-extinction faunas were quite distinct at the order level, with atrypids and strophomenids largely replaced by productids, whose spiny shells may have provided greater resistance to disturbance and/or predation. Thus, extinction survivors persisted in similar ecological niches despite environmental perturbations and considerable change in the taxonomic and ecological composition of the regional species pool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available