4.8 Article

Steering CO2 electroreduction pathway toward ethanol via surface-bounded hydroxyl species-induced noncovalent interaction

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2218987120

Keywords

CO2 electroreduction; non-covalent interaction; *OH coverage; ethanol selectivity; surface-bounded hydroxyl species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have achieved selective and productive electroreduction of carbon dioxide into ethanol using a porous CuO catalyst. They found a volcano-shaped relationship between ethanol selectivity and nanocavity size of the catalyst and identified the confinement effect associated with the nanocavity size as a key factor in enhancing ethanol selectivity.
Selective electroreduction of carbon dioxide (CO2RR) into ethanol at an industrially relevant current density is highly desired. However, it is challenging because the competing ethylene production pathway is generally more thermodynamically favored. Herein, we achieve a selective and productive ethanol production over a porous CuO catalyst that presents a high ethanol Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 44.1 +/- 1.0% and an ethanol-to- ethylene ratio of 1.2 at a large ethanol partial current density of 501.0 +/- 15.0 mA cm(-2), in addition to an extraordinary FE of 90.6 +/- 3.4% for multicarbon products. Intriguingly, we found a volcano-shaped relationship between ethanol selectivity and nanocavity size of porous CuO catalyst in the range of 0 to 20 nm. Mechanistic studies indicate that the increased coverage of surface-bounded hydroxyl species (*OH) associated with the nanocavity size-dependent confinement effect contributes to the remarkable ethanol selectivity, which preferentially favors the *CHCOH hydrogenation to *CHCHOH (ethanol pathway) via yielding the noncovalent interaction. Our findings provide insights in favoring the ethanol formation pathway, which paves the path toward rational design of ethanol-oriented catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available