4.8 Article

The global biomass of wild mammals

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2204892120

Keywords

ecology; biomass; biosphere; quantitative biology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A total wet biomass of approximately 20 million tonnes was estimated for terrestrial wild mammals, with large herbivores contributing the most. The total biomass of wild marine mammals was estimated to be around 40 million tonnes, with baleen whales dominating.
Wild mammals are icons of conservation efforts, yet there is no rigorous estimate avail-able for their overall global biomass. Biomass as a metric allows us to compare species with very different body sizes, and can serve as an indicator of wild mammal presence, trends, and impacts, on a global scale. Here, we compiled estimates of the total abun-dance (i.e., the number of individuals) of several hundred mammal species from the available data, and used these to build a model that infers the total biomass of terrestrial mammal species for which the global abundance is unknown. We present a detailed assessment, arriving at a total wet biomass of =20 million tonnes (Mt) for all terrestrial wild mammals (95% CI 13-38 Mt), i.e., =3 kg per person on earth. The primary contrib-utors to the biomass of wild land mammals are large herbivores such as the white-tailed deer, wild boar, and African elephant. We find that even-hoofed mammals (artiodactyls, such as deer and boars) represent about half of the combined mass of terrestrial wild mammals. In addition, we estimated the total biomass of wild marine mammals at =40 Mt (95% CI 20-80 Mt), with baleen whales comprising more than half of this mass. In order to put wild mammal biomass into perspective, we additionally estimate the biomass of the remaining members of the class Mammalia. The total mammal biomass is overwhelmingly dominated by livestock (=630 Mt) and humans (=390 Mt). This work is a provisional census of wild mammal biomass on Earth and can serve as a benchmark for human impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available