4.6 Article

Data-driven reliability assessment with scarce samples considering multidimensional dependence

Journal

PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103440

Keywords

Data-driven; Copula; Bootstrap method; Sparse grid integration; Active learning Kriging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a data-driven method for assessing reliability using scarce input dataset with multidimensional correlation. The bootstrap resampling algorithm is used to infer the distribution parameters as interval parameters. Vine copula theory is utilized to construct the joint PDF of input variables, and MLE and AIC analysis are employed to select optimal copulas. The failure probability bounds are calculated using the constructed joint PDF with interval distribution parameters by the AK method combining the SGI method.
This study proposes a data-driven method for assessing reliability, based on the scarce input dataset with multidimensional correlation. Since considering the distribution parameters estimated from the scarce dataset as those of the population may lead to epistemic uncertainty, the bootstrap resampling algorithm is adopted to infer the distribution parameters as interval parameters. To account for the variable dependence, vine copula theory is utilized to construct the joint probability density function (PDF) of input variables, and maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) analysis are employed to select optimal copulas based on the samples for the vine structure. Subsequently, the failure probability bounds of a response function are calculated based on the constructed joint PDF with interval distribution parameters by the active learning Kriging (AK) method combining the sparse grid integration (SGI) method. Finally, several examples are provided to demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available