4.4 Article

The clinical impact of the first-trimester nuchal translucency between the 95th-99th percentiles

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages 929-936

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.6390

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the clinical significance of nuchal translucency (NT) between the 95th-99th percentile in terms of typical and atypical chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs), associated fetal congenital defects, and postnatal outcomes. It found that an NT between the 95th-99th percentiles is associated with a 10-fold increased risk of fetal defects and a 12.1% rate of genetic abnormalities. This suggests the need for a detailed fetal anatomy evaluation for these cases.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical significance of nuchal translucency (NT) between the 95th-99th percentile in terms of typical and atypical chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs), associated fetal congenital defects and postnatal outcome. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of fetuses with NT between the 95th-99th percentile. Data regarding the rate of associated fetal defects, genetic abnormalities and postnatal outcome were collected. ResultsA total of 306 cases of fetuses with an NT between the 95th-99th percentiles were included. The overall rate of genetic abnormalities was 12.1% (37/306). Chromosomal abnormalities were found in 10.1% (31/306) of cases and 2% were ACA (6/306). Within this group, two were pathogenic Copy Number Variants (CNVs) and four were single gene disorders. The overall rate of fetal congenital defects was 13.7% (42/306). All ACAs were found in fetuses with congenital defects. Postnatally, a new diagnosis of a single gene disorder was made in 0.85% of cases (2/236). ConclusionsThe presence of an NT between the 95th-99th percentiles carries a 10-fold increased risk of fetal defects, representing an indication for referral for a detailed fetal anatomy evaluation. The risk of ACA is mainly related to the presence of fetal defects, irrespective of the combined test risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available