4.7 Article

Flowability of polymer powders at elevated temperatures for additive manufacturing

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 422, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118460

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; AM; Selective laser sintering; SLS; Powder flowability; Process monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing the polymer powders at different temperatures, the flowability and spreadability of the powders for selective laser sintering were investigated. The Revolution Powder Analyzer and the modified Schulze Ring Shear Tester were used for the measurements. Results of both tests showed that the powders' flowability decreases with increasing temperature, especially near the materials' melting point. Recoating tests on an EOS P395 machine revealed that the number and severity of defects increase with temperature, but they greatly decrease when approaching the sintering window, resulting in a stronger and more defect-resistant powder bed.
The flowability and spreadability of three different polymer powders for selective laser sintering were investigated by analysing the powder at different temperatures. These measurements were performed using both the Revolution Powder Analyzer and the Schulze Ring Shear Tester. The latter device was modified with a selfdeveloped heating system to allow testing at temperatures up to 170 degrees C. Overall, the results of both tests showed that the powders' flowability decreases as the temperature increases, with the largest decrease observed near the materials' melting point. Afterwards, recoating tests were conducted on an EOS P395 machine, which utilized a self-built AI monitoring system to detect and evaluate the severity of defects in the powder bed. The tests revealed that the number and severity of defects also increases with temperature. When approaching the sintering window, the number and severity of defects greatly decreases, and the powder bed becomes stronger and more resistant to defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available