4.7 Article

Evaluation of the immunoprotection efficacy of Riemerella anatipestifer fur-deficient mutant as an attenuated vaccine

Journal

POULTRY SCIENCE
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102450

Keywords

Fur; virulence; immunoprotection; attenuated vaccine; Riemerella anatipestifer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that the RA CH-1 Afur strain is significantly attenuated and provides effective protection against high-dose RA CH-1 infection in ducklings. Inoculation with the mutant strain did not cause clinical symptoms or significant histological lesions, and the bacteria were cleared by the host within 3 days. Furthermore, RA CH-1 Afur induced high levels of IgY antibodies, which persisted for at least 49 days.
Riemerella anatipestifer (R. anatipestifer, RA) is an infectious pathogen that causes septicemia and polyserositis in ducks. Our previous studies showed that RA CH-1 Afur was significantly attenuated in ducklings, which highlights the potential of this strain as a live atten-uated vaccine. In this study, it was shown that infection with 109 CFU of the fur mutant did not cause any clinical symptoms or significant histological lesions in 3-day-old ducklings and that the bacteria were readily cleared by the host within 3 d. Compared with the nonvaccinated group, the group inoculated with the mutant strain RA CH-1 Afur exhibited protection of ducklings against a high-dose (2.28 pound 1010 CFU) challenge with the wild-type strain RA CH-1. Moreover, the average body weights and body weight gains of the Dfur-inoculated group were not signifi-cantly affected by the challenge. Further analysis revealed that RA CH-1 Afur elicited higher IgY titers and that the serum antibody levels persisted for at least 49 d after immunization. Overall, our study showed that RA CH-1 Afur is a safe and effective vaccine candidate that is expected to play an important role in RA CH-1 infection prevention in the duck industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available