4.7 Article

Mechanical characterization of hybrid biocomposites reinforced with nonwoven hemp and unidirectional flax fibers

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 3555-3566

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.27344

Keywords

biocomposites; flax fiber; hemp fiber; mechanical characterization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to characterize hybrid biocomposites produced from flax/polypropylene fibers and hemp/polypropylene fibers. The mechanical performance of the biocomposites was investigated based on the number of layers and stacking sequence. The results showed that each design had its own characteristics, highlighting the potential of these biocomposites for engineering design.
Fiber-reinforced polymers are widely used in many applications where high specific strength and high specific stiffness are required. Biocomposites have replaced synthetic-based fiber-reinforced polymers as a preferred option due to their environmental friendliness, ease of supply, and affordability. Comparable strength synthetic-fiber-reinforced polymers and biocomposites both have lower specific weights. This study aims to characterize hybrid biocomposites produced from unidirectional prepregs made of flax/polypropylene fibers and nonwoven mats made of hemp/polypropylene fibers. Research has also been conducted on how the number of layers and the stacking sequence affect the mechanical performance of hybrid biocomposites. Three different designs of biocomposite plates have been produced using compression molding. They were then subjected to tensile, compressive, shear, bending, Charpy impact, and drop-weight impact tests. According to the test results, it is found that each design has its own characteristics, and the characterized static and dynamic behaviors are very different from each other. Therefore, each biocomposite mentioned here may be a good candidate for engineering design based on the given engineering design criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available