4.5 Article

Biocompatibility evaluation of nano-hydroxyapatite modified hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/polyvinylpyrrolidone blends

Journal

POLYMER BULLETIN
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-023-04870-x

Keywords

Blends; Biopolymer; Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; Nano-hydroxyapatite; Biocompatibility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blending of polymers can improve the properties of the hybrid system without sacrificing component characteristics. A combination of biocompatible cellulose-based polymer HPMC and synthetic biocompatible polymer PVP has been designed for modifying mechanical and thermal properties. Plasticizing with non-toxic plasticizer PEG 6000 has been used to improve flexibility, and the addition of biocompatible filler nHA has reinforced the polymer matrix. The optimized blend meets the requirements for fabricating wound healing patches in the biosector.
Blending of polymers can be utilized to improve the properties of the new hybrid system without sacrificing the individual characteristics of the components. A combination of biocompatible cellulose-based polymer, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and synthetic biocompatible polymer polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) has been designed to modify the mechanical and thermal properties via blending strategy. This work investigates the modification of HPMC and PVP blends through plasticizing with polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000, a non-toxic plasticizer to improve the flexibility of the matrix. The optimized blend system has been embedding with nHA as a biocompatible multifunctional filler to reinforce the polymer matrix for improving the efficacy in biomedical applications. The characterization has been extended through the evaluation of FTIR, XRD, TGA, DSC, SEM and UV-Visible spectroscopy. The reinforced blend has been found to match the requirements for fabricating wound healing patches in the biosector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available