4.7 Article

Exploring the impact of process parameters on the metal-free light-catalyzed ATRP polymerization of PVDF-based block copolymers

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 282, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.126145

Keywords

Poly(vinylidene fluoride); Metal -free synthesis; Light -catalyzed synthesis; Atom transfer radical polymerization; Block copolymers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthesis of well-defined PVDF-based block copolymers has been important for modifying its properties and achieving high-quality composites. ATRP has proven to be a viable technique for controlled synthesis, and OPRCs have been reported as effective photocatalysts in light-catalyzed ATRP. In this study, three OPRs were used for the ATRP of MMA using telechelic PVDF as macroinitiators, and the impact of process parameters was explored.
The synthesis of well-defined poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)-based block copolymers has been an important topic in recent years to accurately modify its properties and to achieve high-quality composites. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) proved itself to be a viable technique for the controlled synthesis of PVDF-based block copolymers. Recently, organic photoredox catalysts (OPRCs) have been reported as effective photocatalysts in light-catalyzed ATRP. Here, we use three OPRs (perylene, 10-methylphenotiazine, 10-phenylphenotiazine) for the ATRP of methylmethacrylate using telechelic PVDF as macroinitiators. We explore the impact of three process parameters: the end group on the polymer chain, the concentration of MMA, and the concentration of the OPRC in solution. First, three different telechelic PVDF were tested under the same monomer and OPRC concentrations to select the best macroinitiator for this system. Then, the effects on the overall control and on the conversion when the concentration of monomer or OPRC is varied were evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available