4.2 Article

Hospitalization and mortality due to hepatitis A in Taiwan: a 15-year nationwide cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 940-945

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12564

Keywords

age; death; HAV; length of stay; liver cirrhosis; sex difference

Funding

  1. Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is the most common food-borne hepatitis in the world. The study objectives were (i) to describe the epidemiology of HAV-related hospitalizations during 1997-2011 in Taiwan, (ii) to examine the age effect on the length of stay (LOS) in hospital and (iii) to study the factors associated with death. The hospitalized cases were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between 1997 and 2011 by ICD-9-CM code of 070.0/070.1. Patient sex, birthday, dates of hospitalization and death were analysed. A total of 3990 HAV-hospitalized cases, males 2467 (62%), were identified. The LOS increased as patients' age increased. The overall mortality rate was 16.8 per 1000 hospitalizations. Males had significantly higher case fatality rate than females (20.7 vs 10.5 per 1000 cases). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for death rose by age and increased rapidly over 40years of age. The aOR and 95% confidence interval [95%CI] for aged 40-59years and aged over 60years were 7.89 (1.06-58.98) and 14.88 (2.02-109.40) compared to aged 0-19 years, respectively. Patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis had significantly higher risk of death (aOR=1.03 [1.01-1.04]), compared to those without liver disease. However, patients with liver disease, but no cirrhosis did not have higher risk of death (aOR=1.00 [0.99-1.01]). The aOR [95%CI] for LOS >9day was 3.26 (1.96-5.40) compared to cases with LOS 9days. Male sex, age over 40years, cirrhotic liver and long LOS are significant factors associated with death in HAV-hospitalized cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available