4.6 Article

Comparison of antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance between a community hospital and tertiary care hospital for evaluation of the antimicrobial stewardship program in Japan

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284806

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare the amount and diversity of antibiotic use and antimicrobial susceptibility of nosocomial isolates between a community hospital (CH) and a tertiary care hospital (TCH) in Japan. The study found that the TCH had a higher antibiotic use rate than the CH, but there was no significant difference in antimicrobial susceptibility. This suggests that increased antibiotic use in the TCH does not lead to increased resistance, possibly due to diversified antibiotic use. Therefore, assessing antibiotic use according to facility type is an effective method for evaluating antimicrobial stewardship programs.
Assessment of risk-adjusted antibiotic use (AU) is recommended to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). We aimed to compare the amount and diversity of AU and antimicrobial susceptibility of nosocomial isolates between a 266-bed community hospital (CH) and a 963-bed tertiary care hospital (TCH) in Japan. The days of therapy/100 bed days (DOT) was measured for four classes of broad-spectrum antibiotics predominantly used for hospital-onset infections. The diversity of AU was evaluated using the modified antibiotic heterogeneity index (AHI). With 10% relative DOT for fluoroquinolones and 30% for each of the remaining three classes, the modified AHI equals 1. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to >= 3 anti-Pseudomonas antibiotic classes. The DOT was significantly higher in the TCH than in the CH (10.85 +/- 1.32 vs. 3.89 +/- 0.93, p < 0.001). For risk-adjusted AU, the DOT was 6.90 +/- 1.50 for acute-phase medical wards in the CH, and 8.35 +/- 1.05 in the TCH excluding the hematology department. In contrast, the DOT of antibiotics for community-acquired infections was higher in the CH than that in the TCH. As quality assessment of AU, higher modified AHI was observed in the TCH than in the CH (0.832 +/- 0.044 vs. 0.721 +/- 0.106, p = 0.003), indicating more diverse use in the TCH. The MDR rate in gram-negative rods was 5.1% in the TCH and 3.4% in the CH (p = 0.453). No significant difference was demonstrated in the MDR rate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae species between hospitals. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were used differently in the TCH and CH. However, an increased antibiotic burden in the TCH did not cause poor susceptibility, possibly because of diversified AU. Considering the different patient populations, benchmarking AU according to the facility type is promising for inter-hospital comparisons of ASPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available